In searching for articles discussing the founding of new Rock Camps, I found myself being extremely wary of the validity of the facts in the articles. More often than not, Rock Camps, and especially new ones, get written up in small local papers where the journalistic standards for proofreading and fact-checking fall by the wayside. From personal experience dealing with the press in relation to the Portland Rock 'n' Roll Camp for Girls (RNRC4G) and their general inability to quote interviewees correctly, or to get the facts correct, I have come to question the accuracy of almost all articles related to Rock Camps. However, that being said, I chose these two articles, because to the best of my knowledge they stay true to the facts and to the camp's mission. On the other hand, if I didn't personally know many of the people quoted in these articles, I wouldn't necessarily have a sense of when they were misquoted, or when the description of the camp and its goals was inaccurate, which then poses a bigger problem for the advertisement and proliferation of Rock Camps, in that they run the risk of being misunderstood through poorly written press.
Oh, and here are the links to the two articles I was talking about in the beginning of this post:
No comments:
Post a Comment